The Pacific Coast Intermodal Port

This site provides publicly available information about the proposed Intermodal Port project being planned by the Port of Coos Bay, Oregon.

 It is designed to provide facts about the project rather than promotional information by project proponents.

The Pacific Coast Intermodal Port Project has three components:

The Pacific Coast Intermodal Port Business Plan

How much will it cost?

The Pacific Coast Intermodal Project is shaping up to be an extremely costly gamble, with estimates soaring as high as $4.36 billion — far beyond initial figures. Despite receiving more than $100 million in public planning funds and new state bonding, supporters press ahead, calling Coos Bay “the Appalachia of Oregon” in a bid to justify the investment. Critics see it as an expensive bet with uncertain returns for a struggling community.

Who will pay for it?

So far, taxpayers are footing most of it — with over $160 million in state funds and $54 million in federal grants committed — while NorthPoint has pledged to contribute but won’t disclose how much. The Port has failed to secure full federal funding in recent years after being rated as lacking the capacity to carry out the project cost-effectively.

Pacific Coast Intermodal Port Project Costs
Item Cost
Design & Permitting Year-1 $70,722,000
Design & Permitting Year-2 $30,000,000
Rail Segment 1 $274,796,000
Rail Segment 2 $1,019,922,000
Container Terminal $1,254,025,000
Eugene Railyard $104,489,000
Navigation Channel $551,368,000
Sub-Total $3,305,322,000
Interest During Construction $182,731,000
Sub-Total $3,488,053,000
Contingency (25%) $872,013,000
Total Costs $4,360,066,000

Note: IDC calculated at the FY24 federal discount rate of 2.75%

Total Costs: $4,360,066,000

Coos Bay Section 204(f)/408 Report to the US Army Corps of Engineers. Economics Appendix – May 2024

Plans for the Coos Bay terminal

The Container Shipping Industry

The global container shipping industry is highly volatile, influenced by shifting trade routes, tariffs, manufacturing patterns, labor disputes, and geopolitical instability. Major shipping companies, primarily based in Asia and Europe, control vessel schedules, form strategic alliances, and increasingly operate their own port terminals, a trend that challenges the relevance of new independent facilities.

West coast container port news

West Coast ports—including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, Seattle-Tacoma, and Vancouver—have recently expanded and modernized with federal infrastructure funding, ensuring competitive capacity and on-dock rail access. Despite these upgrades, the latest U.S. transportation statistics show that West Coast ports have seen flat import growth and declining export volumes, as East and Gulf Coast ports capture more market share.

Impacts on the Coos Bay Community

The Empire District

Empire residents are concerned that the proposed terminal may cause pollution, harm wildlife, strain infrastructure, lower property values, and disrupt neighborhood character.

Noise, Air and Light pollution

The proposed PCIP terminal would generate continuous noise, diesel pollution, and disruptive lighting from around-the-clock ship and train operations, posing health and environmental risks to workers and nearby residents.

Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians Hollering Place

The Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians have long lived along Coos Bay, where the Hollering Place served as a vital historic travel and crossing site near the proposed terminal.

Impacts to recreational use of Coos Bay

Dredging for the terminal would destroy vital estuarine habitats, alter salinity and water flow, harm fisheries and shellfish production, and disrupt recreational use of Coos Bay.

The Rail Line to Eugene and Beyond

What is planned for the rail line

The Port of Coos Bay plans to spend $1.4 billion upgrading its 130-mile rail line to move 2 million containers annually between Coos Bay and Eugene, requiring twelve 1.7-mile-long trains per workday. Public costs have already exceeded $100 million, with more federal grants awarded despite limited public information on the project.

Along the Line

The route crosses mountains, lakes, 121 bridges, and nine tunnels, all of which would need costly upgrades for double-stacked containers and increased train traffic. Communities like Reedsport face significant impacts, with up to twelve 1.7+ mile trains passing daily.

In Eugene

The Coos Bay container trains will strain the already limited rail yard capacity in Eugene. Nearby neighborhoods would be impacted with additional noise and major road crossings would experience more frequent delays from long trains moving through the area.

North and South from Eugene

Most freight is expected to travel north to Portland before heading east, avoiding the longer southern route over Donner Pass. This routing still funnels additional heavy rail traffic through Oregon’s busiest rail corridors.

Climate Consequences

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Ecological Consequences

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

How to get involved

Sign up for our mailing list to stay up-to-date on the latest news and information surrounding the PCIP and learn about actions you can take.

Get Updates from PCIP Info

Sign up below to get updates from us as we continue to gather information to share on our website. If you’d like to share your email with our partners, check the box below. Your information will only be used to provide you with PCIP updates and will not be used for any sales or marketing materials.